Exploring the acceptance of e-learning in health professions education in Iran based on the technology acceptance model (TAM)

0
Exploring the acceptance of e-learning in health professions education in Iran based on the technology acceptance model (TAM)
  • Fonseca, D., Conde, M. Á. & García-Peñalvo, F. J. Improving the information society skills: Is knowledge accessible for all?. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 17(2), 229–245 (2018).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Mastour, H., Dehghani, T., Moradi, E. & Eslami, S. Early prediction of medical students’ performance in high-stakes examinations using machine learning approaches. Heliyon 9(7), e18248 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazim, C., Ismail, N. D. B. & Tazilah, M. Application of technology acceptance model (TAM) towards online learning during covid-19 pandemic: Accounting students perspective. Int. J. Bus. Econ. Law 24(1), 13–20 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Sabiote, C., Valerio-Peña, A. T., Batista-Almonte, R. A. & Úbeda-Sánchez, Á. M. Perceived utility and learning by dominican university students in virtual teaching–learning environments: An analysis of multiple serial mediation based on the extended technology acceptance model. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distrib. Learn. 25(2), 20–40 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Emran, M. & Granić, A. Is it still valid or outdated? A bibliometric analysis of the technology acceptance model and its applications from 2010 to 2020. In Recent Advances in Technology Acceptance Models and Theories (eds Al-Emran, M. & Shaalan, K.) 1–12 (Springer, 2021).

    Chapter 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Vorm, E. & Combs, D. J. Integrating transparency, trust, and acceptance: The intelligent systems technology acceptance model (ISTAM). Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 38, 1–18 (2022).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Fussell, S. G. & Truong, D. Using virtual reality for dynamic learning: an extended technology acceptance model. Virtual Real. 26(1), 249–267 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Regmi, K. & Jones, L. A systematic review of the factors—Enablers and barriers—Affecting e-learning in health sciences education. BMC Med. Educ. 20(1), 1–18 (2020).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, T.-H., Liu, F., Chen, L.-C. & Tsai, C.-C. The acceptance and impact of Google classroom integrating into a clinical pathology course for nursing students: A technology acceptance model approach. PLoS ONE 16(3), e0247819 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarhini, A., Hone, K. & Liu, X. The effects of individual differences on e-learning users’ behaviour in developing countries: A structural equation model. Comput. Hum. Behav. 41, 153–163 (2014).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Alfadda, H. A. & Mahdi, H. S. Measuring students’ use of zoom application in language course based on the technology acceptance model (TAM). J. Psycholinguist. Res. 50(4), 883–900 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Rahmi, A. M. et al. The influence of information system success and technology acceptance model on social media factors in education. Sustainability 13(14), 7770 (2021).

    Article 
    MATH 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Teo, T. Development and validation of the E-learning acceptance measure (ElAM). Internet High. Educ. 13(3), 148–152 (2010).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Abdullah, F. & Ward, R. Developing a general extended technology acceptance model for e-learning (GETAMEL) by analysing commonly used external factors. Comput. Hum. Behav. 56, 238–256 (2016).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ngampornchai, A. & Adams, J. Students’ acceptance and readiness for E-learning in northeastern Thailand. Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ. 13(1), 34 (2016).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Alsharida, R., Hammood, M. & Al-Emran, M. Mobile learning adoption: A systematic review of the technology acceptance model from 2017 to 2020. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn. (iJET) 16(5), 147–162 (2021).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh, V. & Bala, H. Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decis. Sci. 39(2), 273–315 (2008).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Chau, P. Y. K. An empirical assessment of a modified technology acceptance model. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 13(2), 185–204 (1996).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Marangunić, N. & Granić, A. Technology acceptance model: A literature review from 1986 to 2013. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 14(1), 81–95 (2015).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, F. D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13(3), 319–340 (1989).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Yong Varela, L. A., Rivas Tovar, L. A. & Chaparro, J. Technological acceptance model (TAM): A study of the influence of the national culture and of the user profile in the use of ICTS. Innovar 20(36), 187–203 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Gahtani, S. S. Empirical investigation of e-learning acceptance and assimilation: A structural equation model. Appl. Comput. Inform. 12(1), 27–50 (2016).

    Article 
    MathSciNet 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim, R. et al. E-learning acceptance based on technology acceptance model (TAM). J. Fundam. Appl. Sci. 9(4S), 871–889 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Salloum, S. A., Al-Emran, M., Shaalan, K. & Tarhini, A. Factors affecting the E-learning acceptance: A case study from UAE. Educ. Inf. Technol. 24(1), 509–530 (2019).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Emran, M. & Teo, T. Do knowledge acquisition and knowledge sharing really affect e-learning adoption? An empirical study. Educ. Inf. Technol. 25(3), 1983–1998 (2020).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Fauzi, A., Wandira, R., Sepri, D. & Hafid, A. Exploring students’ acceptance of google classroom during the covid-19 pandemic by using the technology acceptance model in West Sumatera Universities. Electron. J. E-Learn. 19(4), 233–240 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Natasia, S. R., Wiranti, Y. T. & Parastika, A. Acceptance analysis of NUADU as e-learning platform using the technology acceptance model (TAM) approach. Procedia Comput. Sci. 197, 512–520 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Abuhassna, H. et al. Trends on using the technology acceptance model (TAM) for online learning: a bibliometric and content analysis. Int. J. Inf. Educ. Technol. 13(1), 131–142 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Saif, N. et al. Chat-GPT; validating technology acceptance model (TAM) in education sector via ubiquitous learning mechanism. Comput. Hum. Behav. 154, 108097 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Tao, D. et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of user acceptance of consumer-oriented health information technologies. Comput. Hum. Behav. 104, 106147 (2020).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Doan Hoa, D. et al. Drivers of iPad use by undergraduate medical students: The technology acceptance model perspective. BMC Med. Educ. 22(1), 87 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Emadzadeh, A. et al. Virtual dissection: An educational technology to enrich medical students’ learning environment in gastrointestinal anatomy course. Med. Sci. Educ. 33(5), 1175–1182 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Holden, R. J. & Karsh, B.-T. The technology acceptance model: Its past and its future in health care. J. Biomed. Inform. 43(1), 159–172 (2010).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Mustafa, A. S. & Garcia, M. B. (eds.). Theories integrated with technology acceptance model (TAM) in online learning acceptance and continuance intention: A systematic review. In 2021 1st Conference on Online Teaching for Mobile Education (OT4ME) (IEEE, 2021).

  • Al-Emran, M. Evaluating the use of smartwatches for learning purposes through the integration of the technology acceptance model and task-technology fit. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 37(19), 1874–1882 (2021).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabet, S. M., Lambie, G. W., Jahani, S. & Rasoolimanesh, S. M. An analysis of the World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0 measurement model using partial least squares-structural equation modeling. Assessment 27(8), 1731–1747 (2020).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogla, R. A. S. & Rahma, A. M. S. Adopting E-learning model based on the TAM expansion through subjective norm to discover intentions of students. J. Coll. Basic Educ. 25(104), 1130–1153 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Nazarpoori, A. & Tabarsa, G. Considering effective factors on electronic learning system acceptance (ELS) according to technology acceptance model (TAM). Technol. Educ. J. (TEJ). 9(1), 33–40 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, H. & Yoo, Y. It’s all about attitude: revisiting the technology acceptance model. Decis. Support Syst. 38(1), 19–31 (2004).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosita, T. & Fatmasari, R. Acceptance of distance learning technology in technology-based learning management. Al-Tanzim J. Manaj. Pendidik. Islam 7(4), 1191–1201 (2023).

    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Almulla, M. Technology acceptance model (TAM) and e-learning system use for education sustainability. Acad. Strateg. Manag. J. 20(4), 1–13 (2021).

    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Handy, J., Whiddett, R. & Hunter, I. A technology acceptance model for inter-organisational electronic medical records systems. Aust. J. Inf. Syst. 9(1), 39–50 (2001).

    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Emran, M., Mezhuyev, V. & Kamaludin, A. Technology acceptance model in M-learning context: A systematic review. Comput. Educ. 125, 389–412 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghorbani Piralidehi, F. & Ali, B. A. Examining the acceptance model of IPM technology among gardeners in Dalahoo. Ext. Res. Agric. Educ. 6(4), 107–123 (2014).

    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline, R. B. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (Guilford Publications, 2015).

    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E. & Tatham, R. L. Multivariate data analysis 6th Edition. Pearson Prentice Hall New Jersey humans. Crit. Reform. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 87, 49–74 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 18(1), 39–50 (1981).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Werts, C. E., Linn, R. L. & Jöreskog, K. G. Intraclass reliability estimates: Testing structural assumptions. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 34(1), 25–33 (1974).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P. & Yi, Y. On the evaluation of structural equation models. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 16(1), 74–94 (1988).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Chin, W. W. The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Mod. Methods Bus. Res. 295(2), 295–336 (1998).

    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Gliem, J. A. & Gliem, R. R. (eds.). Calculating, Interpreting, and Reporting CRONBACH’S Alpha Reliability Coefficient for Likert-Type Scales2003: Midwest Research-to-Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community ….

  • Taber, K. S. The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Res. Sci. Educ. 48(6), 1273–1296 (2018).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C. The assessment of reliability. In Psychometric Theory (1994).

  • Gefen, D., Straub, D. & Boudreau, M.-C. Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 4(1), 7 (2000).

    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk, R. F. & Miller, N. B. A Primer for Soft Modeling (University of Akron Press, 1992).

    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Teo, T. An empirical study to validate the technology acceptance model (TAM) in explaining the intention to use technology among educational users. Int. J. Inf. Commun. Technol. Educ. (IJICTE) 6(4), 1–12 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Amoako-Gyampah, K. & Salam, A. F. An extension of the technology acceptance model in an ERP implementation environment. Inf. Manag. 41(6), 731–745 (2004).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, E. S. & Park, M. S. Factors of the technology acceptance model for construction IT. Appl. Sci. 10(22), 8299 (2020).

    Article 
    MATH 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Briz-Ponce, L. & García-Peñalvo, F. J. An empirical assessment of a technology acceptance model for apps in medical education. J. Med. Syst. 39, 1–5 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Niroumand, S., Mastour, H., Moodi Ghalibaf, A., Shamshirian, A. & Moghadasin, M. Medical students’ attitude toward e-learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Shiraz E-Med. J. 23(9), e121340 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Maatuk, A. M., Elberkawi, E. K., Aljawarneh, S., Rashaideh, H. & Alharbi, H. The COVID-19 pandemic and E-learning: Challenges and opportunities from the perspective of students and instructors. J. Comput. High. Educ. 34(1), 21–38 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Surendran, P. Technology acceptance model: A survey of literature. Int. J. Bus. Soc. Res. 2(4), 175–178 (2012).

    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Averweg, U. R. Information technology acceptance in South Africa: An investigation of perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and actual system use constructs. Afr. J. Inf. Syst. 1(1), 4 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  • link

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *