Fonseca, D., Conde, M. Á. & García-Peñalvo, F. J. Improving the information society skills: Is knowledge accessible for all?. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 17(2), 229–245 (2018).
Google Scholar
Mastour, H., Dehghani, T., Moradi, E. & Eslami, S. Early prediction of medical students’ performance in high-stakes examinations using machine learning approaches. Heliyon 9(7), e18248 (2023).
Google Scholar
Lazim, C., Ismail, N. D. B. & Tazilah, M. Application of technology acceptance model (TAM) towards online learning during covid-19 pandemic: Accounting students perspective. Int. J. Bus. Econ. Law 24(1), 13–20 (2021).
Rodríguez-Sabiote, C., Valerio-Peña, A. T., Batista-Almonte, R. A. & Úbeda-Sánchez, Á. M. Perceived utility and learning by dominican university students in virtual teaching–learning environments: An analysis of multiple serial mediation based on the extended technology acceptance model. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distrib. Learn. 25(2), 20–40 (2024).
Al-Emran, M. & Granić, A. Is it still valid or outdated? A bibliometric analysis of the technology acceptance model and its applications from 2010 to 2020. In Recent Advances in Technology Acceptance Models and Theories (eds Al-Emran, M. & Shaalan, K.) 1–12 (Springer, 2021).
Google Scholar
Vorm, E. & Combs, D. J. Integrating transparency, trust, and acceptance: The intelligent systems technology acceptance model (ISTAM). Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 38, 1–18 (2022).
Google Scholar
Fussell, S. G. & Truong, D. Using virtual reality for dynamic learning: an extended technology acceptance model. Virtual Real. 26(1), 249–267 (2022).
Google Scholar
Regmi, K. & Jones, L. A systematic review of the factors—Enablers and barriers—Affecting e-learning in health sciences education. BMC Med. Educ. 20(1), 1–18 (2020).
Google Scholar
Huang, T.-H., Liu, F., Chen, L.-C. & Tsai, C.-C. The acceptance and impact of Google classroom integrating into a clinical pathology course for nursing students: A technology acceptance model approach. PLoS ONE 16(3), e0247819 (2021).
Google Scholar
Tarhini, A., Hone, K. & Liu, X. The effects of individual differences on e-learning users’ behaviour in developing countries: A structural equation model. Comput. Hum. Behav. 41, 153–163 (2014).
Google Scholar
Alfadda, H. A. & Mahdi, H. S. Measuring students’ use of zoom application in language course based on the technology acceptance model (TAM). J. Psycholinguist. Res. 50(4), 883–900 (2021).
Google Scholar
Al-Rahmi, A. M. et al. The influence of information system success and technology acceptance model on social media factors in education. Sustainability 13(14), 7770 (2021).
Google Scholar
Teo, T. Development and validation of the E-learning acceptance measure (ElAM). Internet High. Educ. 13(3), 148–152 (2010).
Google Scholar
Abdullah, F. & Ward, R. Developing a general extended technology acceptance model for e-learning (GETAMEL) by analysing commonly used external factors. Comput. Hum. Behav. 56, 238–256 (2016).
Google Scholar
Ngampornchai, A. & Adams, J. Students’ acceptance and readiness for E-learning in northeastern Thailand. Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ. 13(1), 34 (2016).
Google Scholar
Alsharida, R., Hammood, M. & Al-Emran, M. Mobile learning adoption: A systematic review of the technology acceptance model from 2017 to 2020. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn. (iJET) 16(5), 147–162 (2021).
Google Scholar
Venkatesh, V. & Bala, H. Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decis. Sci. 39(2), 273–315 (2008).
Google Scholar
Chau, P. Y. K. An empirical assessment of a modified technology acceptance model. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 13(2), 185–204 (1996).
Google Scholar
Marangunić, N. & Granić, A. Technology acceptance model: A literature review from 1986 to 2013. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 14(1), 81–95 (2015).
Google Scholar
Davis, F. D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13(3), 319–340 (1989).
Google Scholar
Yong Varela, L. A., Rivas Tovar, L. A. & Chaparro, J. Technological acceptance model (TAM): A study of the influence of the national culture and of the user profile in the use of ICTS. Innovar 20(36), 187–203 (2010).
Al-Gahtani, S. S. Empirical investigation of e-learning acceptance and assimilation: A structural equation model. Appl. Comput. Inform. 12(1), 27–50 (2016).
Google Scholar
Ibrahim, R. et al. E-learning acceptance based on technology acceptance model (TAM). J. Fundam. Appl. Sci. 9(4S), 871–889 (2017).
Google Scholar
Salloum, S. A., Al-Emran, M., Shaalan, K. & Tarhini, A. Factors affecting the E-learning acceptance: A case study from UAE. Educ. Inf. Technol. 24(1), 509–530 (2019).
Google Scholar
Al-Emran, M. & Teo, T. Do knowledge acquisition and knowledge sharing really affect e-learning adoption? An empirical study. Educ. Inf. Technol. 25(3), 1983–1998 (2020).
Google Scholar
Fauzi, A., Wandira, R., Sepri, D. & Hafid, A. Exploring students’ acceptance of google classroom during the covid-19 pandemic by using the technology acceptance model in West Sumatera Universities. Electron. J. E-Learn. 19(4), 233–240 (2021).
Google Scholar
Natasia, S. R., Wiranti, Y. T. & Parastika, A. Acceptance analysis of NUADU as e-learning platform using the technology acceptance model (TAM) approach. Procedia Comput. Sci. 197, 512–520 (2022).
Google Scholar
Abuhassna, H. et al. Trends on using the technology acceptance model (TAM) for online learning: a bibliometric and content analysis. Int. J. Inf. Educ. Technol. 13(1), 131–142 (2023).
Saif, N. et al. Chat-GPT; validating technology acceptance model (TAM) in education sector via ubiquitous learning mechanism. Comput. Hum. Behav. 154, 108097 (2024).
Google Scholar
Tao, D. et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of user acceptance of consumer-oriented health information technologies. Comput. Hum. Behav. 104, 106147 (2020).
Google Scholar
Doan Hoa, D. et al. Drivers of iPad use by undergraduate medical students: The technology acceptance model perspective. BMC Med. Educ. 22(1), 87 (2022).
Google Scholar
Emadzadeh, A. et al. Virtual dissection: An educational technology to enrich medical students’ learning environment in gastrointestinal anatomy course. Med. Sci. Educ. 33(5), 1175–1182 (2023).
Google Scholar
Holden, R. J. & Karsh, B.-T. The technology acceptance model: Its past and its future in health care. J. Biomed. Inform. 43(1), 159–172 (2010).
Google Scholar
Mustafa, A. S. & Garcia, M. B. (eds.). Theories integrated with technology acceptance model (TAM) in online learning acceptance and continuance intention: A systematic review. In 2021 1st Conference on Online Teaching for Mobile Education (OT4ME) (IEEE, 2021).
Al-Emran, M. Evaluating the use of smartwatches for learning purposes through the integration of the technology acceptance model and task-technology fit. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 37(19), 1874–1882 (2021).
Google Scholar
Tabet, S. M., Lambie, G. W., Jahani, S. & Rasoolimanesh, S. M. An analysis of the World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0 measurement model using partial least squares-structural equation modeling. Assessment 27(8), 1731–1747 (2020).
Google Scholar
Ogla, R. A. S. & Rahma, A. M. S. Adopting E-learning model based on the TAM expansion through subjective norm to discover intentions of students. J. Coll. Basic Educ. 25(104), 1130–1153 (2019).
Google Scholar
Nazarpoori, A. & Tabarsa, G. Considering effective factors on electronic learning system acceptance (ELS) according to technology acceptance model (TAM). Technol. Educ. J. (TEJ). 9(1), 33–40 (2014).
Yang, H. & Yoo, Y. It’s all about attitude: revisiting the technology acceptance model. Decis. Support Syst. 38(1), 19–31 (2004).
Google Scholar
Rosita, T. & Fatmasari, R. Acceptance of distance learning technology in technology-based learning management. Al-Tanzim J. Manaj. Pendidik. Islam 7(4), 1191–1201 (2023).
Google Scholar
Almulla, M. Technology acceptance model (TAM) and e-learning system use for education sustainability. Acad. Strateg. Manag. J. 20(4), 1–13 (2021).
Google Scholar
Handy, J., Whiddett, R. & Hunter, I. A technology acceptance model for inter-organisational electronic medical records systems. Aust. J. Inf. Syst. 9(1), 39–50 (2001).
Google Scholar
Al-Emran, M., Mezhuyev, V. & Kamaludin, A. Technology acceptance model in M-learning context: A systematic review. Comput. Educ. 125, 389–412 (2018).
Google Scholar
Ghorbani Piralidehi, F. & Ali, B. A. Examining the acceptance model of IPM technology among gardeners in Dalahoo. Ext. Res. Agric. Educ. 6(4), 107–123 (2014).
Google Scholar
Kline, R. B. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (Guilford Publications, 2015).
Google Scholar
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E. & Tatham, R. L. Multivariate data analysis 6th Edition. Pearson Prentice Hall New Jersey humans. Crit. Reform. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 87, 49–74 (2006).
Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 18(1), 39–50 (1981).
Google Scholar
Werts, C. E., Linn, R. L. & Jöreskog, K. G. Intraclass reliability estimates: Testing structural assumptions. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 34(1), 25–33 (1974).
Google Scholar
Bagozzi, R. P. & Yi, Y. On the evaluation of structural equation models. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 16(1), 74–94 (1988).
Google Scholar
Chin, W. W. The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Mod. Methods Bus. Res. 295(2), 295–336 (1998).
Google Scholar
Gliem, J. A. & Gliem, R. R. (eds.). Calculating, Interpreting, and Reporting CRONBACH’S Alpha Reliability Coefficient for Likert-Type Scales2003: Midwest Research-to-Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community ….
Taber, K. S. The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Res. Sci. Educ. 48(6), 1273–1296 (2018).
Google Scholar
Nunnally, J. C. The assessment of reliability. In Psychometric Theory (1994).
Gefen, D., Straub, D. & Boudreau, M.-C. Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 4(1), 7 (2000).
Google Scholar
Falk, R. F. & Miller, N. B. A Primer for Soft Modeling (University of Akron Press, 1992).
Google Scholar
Teo, T. An empirical study to validate the technology acceptance model (TAM) in explaining the intention to use technology among educational users. Int. J. Inf. Commun. Technol. Educ. (IJICTE) 6(4), 1–12 (2010).
Google Scholar
Amoako-Gyampah, K. & Salam, A. F. An extension of the technology acceptance model in an ERP implementation environment. Inf. Manag. 41(6), 731–745 (2004).
Google Scholar
Park, E. S. & Park, M. S. Factors of the technology acceptance model for construction IT. Appl. Sci. 10(22), 8299 (2020).
Google Scholar
Briz-Ponce, L. & García-Peñalvo, F. J. An empirical assessment of a technology acceptance model for apps in medical education. J. Med. Syst. 39, 1–5 (2015).
Google Scholar
Niroumand, S., Mastour, H., Moodi Ghalibaf, A., Shamshirian, A. & Moghadasin, M. Medical students’ attitude toward e-learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Shiraz E-Med. J. 23(9), e121340 (2022).
Google Scholar
Maatuk, A. M., Elberkawi, E. K., Aljawarneh, S., Rashaideh, H. & Alharbi, H. The COVID-19 pandemic and E-learning: Challenges and opportunities from the perspective of students and instructors. J. Comput. High. Educ. 34(1), 21–38 (2022).
Google Scholar
Surendran, P. Technology acceptance model: A survey of literature. Int. J. Bus. Soc. Res. 2(4), 175–178 (2012).
Google Scholar
Averweg, U. R. Information technology acceptance in South Africa: An investigation of perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and actual system use constructs. Afr. J. Inf. Syst. 1(1), 4 (2008).
link