Twitter users perceptions of AI-based e-learning technologies
Zahabi, M. & Abdul Razak, A. M. Adaptive virtual reality-based training: A systematic literature review and framework. Virtual Real. 24, 725–752. (2020).
Google Scholar
Raj, N. S. & Renumol, V. G. A systematic literature review on adaptive content recommenders in personalized learning environments from 2015 to 2020. J. Comput. Educ. 9, 113–148. (2022).
Google Scholar
Al-Badi, A., Khan, A. & Eid-Alotaibi,. Perceptions of learners and instructors towards artificial intelligence in personalized learning. Proced. Comput. Sci. 201, 445–451. (2022).
Bizami, N. A., Tasir, Z. & Kew, S. N. Innovative pedagogical principles and technological tools capabilities for immersive blended learning: A systematic literature review. Educ. Inf. Technol. 28, 1373–1425. (2023).
Google Scholar
Won, M. et al. Diverse approaches to learning with immersive virtual reality identified from a systematic review. Comput. Educ. 195, 104701. (2023).
Google Scholar
Tang, Y. M., Chau, K. Y., Kwok, A. P. K., Zhu, T. & Ma, X. A systematic review of immersive technology applications for medical practice and education—trends, application areas, recipients, teaching contents, evaluation methods, and performance. Educ. Res. Rev. 35, 100429. (2022).
Google Scholar
Wilkerson, M., Maldonado, V., Sivaraman, S., Rao, R. R. & Elsaadany, M. Incorporating immersive learning into biomedical engineering laboratories using virtual reality. J. Biol. Eng. 16, 20. (2022).
Google Scholar
Taylor, A.-D. & Hung, W. The effects of microlearning: A scoping review. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 70, 363–395. (2022).
Google Scholar
Wang, C., Bakhet, M., Roberts, D., Gnani, S. & El-Osta, A. The efficacy of microlearning in improving self-care capability: A systematic review of the literature. Public Health 186, 286–296. (2020).
Google Scholar
Oliveira, W. et al. Tailored gamification in education: A literature review and future agenda. Educ. Inf. Technol. 28, 373–406. (2023).
Google Scholar
Indriasari, T. D., Luxton-Reilly, A. & Denny, P. Gamification of student peer review in education: A systematic literature review. Educ. Inf. Technol. 25, 5205–5234. (2020).
Google Scholar
Liu, T., Oubibi, M., Zhou, Y. & Fute, A. Research on online teachers’ training based on the gamification design: A survey analysis of primary and secondary school teachers. Heliyon 9, e15053. (2023).
Google Scholar
Widiastuti, N. L. A systematic literature review of mobile learning applications in environmental education from 2011–2021. J. Educ. Technol. Inst. 1, 89–98 (2022).
Criollo-C, S., Guerrero-Arias, A., Jaramillo-Alcázar, A. & Luján-Mora, S. Mobile learning technologies for education: Benefits and pending issues. Appl. Sci. (2021).
Google Scholar
Chelarescu, P. Deception in social learning: a multi-agent reinforcement learning perspective. arxiv: 2106.05402 (2021)
Gweon, H. Inferential social learning: Cognitive foundations of human social learning and teaching. Trends Cogn. Sci. 25, 896–910. (2021).
Google Scholar
Javaid, M., Haleem, A., Singh, R. P., Khan, S. & Khan, I. H. Unlocking the opportunities through chatgpt tool towards ameliorating the education system. BenchCouncil Trans. Benchmarks Stand. Eval. 3, 100115. (2023).
Google Scholar
Sok, S. & Heng, K. ChatGPT for education and research: A review of benefits and risks. SSRN Electron. J. (2023).
Google Scholar
Yilmaz, R. & Karaoglan Yilmaz, F. G. Augmented intelligence in programming learning: Examining student views on the use of chatgpt for programming learning. Comput. Hum. Behav. Artif. Hum. 1, 100005. (2023).
Google Scholar
Becker, B. A. et al. Programming is hard—or at least it used to be: Educational opportunities and challenges of AI code generation. In Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1, SIGCSE 2023, 500–506, (Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2023).
Ernst, E., Merola, R. & Samaan, D. Economics of artificial intelligence: Implications for the future of work. IZA J. Labor Policy 9, 55. (2019).
Google Scholar
Jaiswal, A., Arun, C. J. & Varma, A. Rebooting employees: Upskilling for artificial intelligence in multinational corporations. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 33, 1179–1208. (2022).
Google Scholar
Kirov, V. & Malamin, B. Are translators afraid of artificial intelligence?. Societies (2022).
Google Scholar
Selwyn, N. Should Robots Replace Teachers?: AI and the Future of Education (John Wiley & Sons, 2019).
Baidoo-Anu, D. & Owusu Ansah, L. Education in the era of generative artificial intelligence (AI): Understanding the potential benefits of chatgpt in promoting teaching and learning. J. AI 7, 52–62. (2023).
Google Scholar
van Leeuwen, K. G., de Rooij, M., Schalekamp, S., van Ginneken, B. & Rutten, M. J. C. M. How does artificial intelligence in radiology improve efficiency and health outcomes?. Pediatr. Radiol. 52, 2087–2093. (2022).
Google Scholar
Shingte, K., Chaudhari, A., Patil, A., Chaudhari, A. & Desai, S. Chatbot development for educational institute. SSRN Electron. J. (2021).
Google Scholar
Wang, X., Lin, X. & Shao, B. How does artificial intelligence create business agility? Evidence from chatbots. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 66, 102535. (2022).
Google Scholar
Parikh, R. B., Teeple, S. & Navathe, A. S. Addressing bias in artificial intelligence in health care. JAMA 322, 2377–2378. (2019).
Google Scholar
Mazurek, G. & Małagocka, K. Perception of privacy and data protection in the context of the development of artificial intelligence. J. Manag. Anal. 6, 344–364 (2019).
David, W. E. A. Ai-powered lethal autonomous weapon systems in defence transformation. Impact and challenges. In Modelling and Simulation for Autonomous Systems (eds Mazal, J. et al.) 337–350 (Springer International Publishing, 2020).
Google Scholar
May, M. & George, S. Privacy concerns in e-learning: Is UsingTracking system a threat?. Int. J. Inf. Educ. Technol. 1, 1–8 (2011).
Google Scholar
Ashman, H. et al. The ethical and social implications of personalization technologies for e-learning. Inf. Manag. 51, 819–832. (2014).
Google Scholar
Ma, Y., Wang, Z., Yang, H. & Yang, L. Artificial intelligence applications in the development of autonomous vehicles: A survey. IEEE/CAA J. Autom. Sin. 7, 315–329. (2020).
Google Scholar
Wei, J., Karuppiah, M. & Prathik, A. College music education and teaching based on AI techniques. Comput. Electr. Eng. 100, 107851. (2022).
Google Scholar
Mahmood, A., Fung, J. W., Won, I. & Huang, C.-M. Owning mistakes sincerely: Strategies for mitigating AI errors. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’22, (Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2022).
Carroll, M., Chan, A., Ashton, H. & Krueger, D. Characterizing manipulation from AI systems. arxiv: 2303.09387 (2023).
Yu, H. & Guo, Y. Generative artificial intelligence empowers educational reform: Current status, issues, and prospects. Front. Educ. (2023).
Google Scholar
Kemp, S. Digital 2023: Global digital overview. (Accessed April 2023); Online (2023).
Zhan, Y., Etter, J.-F., Leischow, S. & Zeng, D. Electronic cigarette usage patterns: A case study combining survey and social media data. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 26, 9–18. (2019).
Google Scholar
Hassanpour, S., Tomita, N., DeLise, T., Crosier, B. & Marsch, L. A. Identifying substance use risk based on deep neural networks and instagram social media data. Neuropsychopharmacology 44, 487–494. (2019).
Google Scholar
Rains, S. A., Leroy, G., Warner, E. L. & Harber, P. Psycholinguistic markers of COVID-19 conspiracy tweets and predictors of tweet dissemination. Health Commun. (2021).
Google Scholar
He, L. et al. Why do people oppose mask wearing? a comprehensive analysis of U.S. tweets during the COVID-19 pandemic. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 28, 1564–1573. (2021).
Google Scholar
Ainley, E., Witwicki, C., Tallett, A. & Graham, C. Using twitter comments to understand people’s experiences of UK health care during the COVID-19 pandemic: Thematic and sentiment analysis. J. Med. Internet Res. (2021).
Google Scholar
Kwok, S. W. H., Vadde, S. K. & Wang, G. Tweet topics and sentiments relating to COVID-19 vaccination among Australian twitter users: Machine learning analysis. J. Med. Internet Res. 23, e26953. (2021).
Google Scholar
Aljabri, M. et al. Sentiment analysis of Arabic tweets regarding distance learning in Saudi Arabia during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sensors (Basel) 21, 5431. (2021).
Google Scholar
Mujahid, M. et al. Sentiment analysis and topic modeling on tweets about online education during COVID-19. Appl. Sci. (Basel) 11, 8438. (2021).
Google Scholar
Asare, A. O., Yap, R., Truong, N. & Sarpong, E. O. The pandemic semesters: Examining public opinion regarding online learning amidst COVID-19. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 37, 1591–1605. (2021).
Google Scholar
Statista. Distribution of twitter users worldwide as of april 2021, by age group. Statista. (2021).
Hutto, C. & Gilbert, E. Vader: A parsimonious rule-based model for sentiment analysis of social media text. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, ICWSM 2014 (2015).
Mohammad, S. & Turney, P. Emotions evoked by common words and phrases: Using mechanical turk to create an emotion lexicon. In Proceedings of the NAACL HLT 2010 Workshop on Computational Approaches to Analysis and Generation of Emotion in Text (LA, California, 2010).
Sievert, C. & Shirley, K. LDAvis: A method for visualizing and interpreting topics. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Interactive Language Learning, Visualization, and Interfaces, 63–70, (Association for Computational Linguistics, Baltimore, Maryland, 2014).
Kemp, S. Digital 2022: Twitter report (Accessed July 2022). Online (2022).
Tumasjan, A., Sprenger, T., Sandner, P. & Welpe, I. Predicting elections with twitter: What 140 characters reveal about political sentiment. In Proc. Fourth Int. AAAI Conf. Weblogs Soc. Media Predict., vol. 10 (2010).
Oyebode, O., Orji, R. Social. & media and sentiment analysis: The Nigeria presidential election,. In 2019 IEEE 10th Annual Information Technology. Electronics and Mobile Communication Conference (IEMCON)2019, (IEEE 2019).
Budiharto, W. & Meiliana, M. Prediction and analysis of Indonesia presidential election from twitter using sentiment analysis. J. Big Data (2018).
Google Scholar
Řehuřek, R. & Sojka, P. Software framework for topic modelling with large corpora. In Proceedings of LREC 2010 workshop New Challenges for NLP Frameworks, 46–50 (Univerity of Malta, 2010).
Bird, S., Klein, E. & Loper, E. Natural Language Processing with Python (O’Reilly Media, 2009).
Stracqualursi, L. & Agati, P. Tweet topics and sentiments relating to distance learning among Italian twitter users. Sci. Rep. 12, 9163 (2022).
Google Scholar
Blei, D. M., Ng, A. Y., Jordan, M. I. & Lafferty, J. Latent dirichlet allocation. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3, 993–1022 (2003).
Lee, J. et al. Ensemble modeling for sustainable technology transfer. Sustainability 10, 22–78. (2018).
Google Scholar
Röder, M., Both, A. & Hinneburg, A. Exploring the space of topic coherence measures. In Proceedings of the Eighth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining – WSDM ’15 (ACM Press, 2015).
Sievert, C. & Shirley, K. Package ldavis (Online) (2022).
Edwards, B. I. & Cheok, A. D. Why not robot teachers: Artificial intelligence for addressing teacher shortage. Appl. Artif. Intell. 32, 345–360. (2018).
Google Scholar
Plutchik, R. A general psychoevolutionary theory of emotion. In Theories of Emotion, 3–33, (Elsevier, 1980).
Cowen, A. S. & Keltner, D. Self-report captures 27 distinct categories of emotion bridged by continuous gradients. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 114, E7900–E7909. (2017).
Google Scholar
Reyna, J. The potential of artificial intelligence (AI) and chatgpt for teaching, learning and research. In EdMedia+ Innovate Learning, 1509–1519 (Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), 2023).
link
