Additive manufacturing source identification from photographs using deep learning
Kim, H., Lin, Y. & Tseng, T.-L. B. A review on quality control in additive manufacturing. Rapid Prototyp. J.24, 645–669 (2018).
Google Scholar
Vo, B., Kongar, E. & Suarez-Barraza, M. F. Root-cause problem solving in an industry 4.0 context. IEEE Eng. Manag. Rev. 48, 48–56 (2020).
Google Scholar
Handley, S. & Gray, J. Managing quality in a heterogeneous contract manufacturing environment. Decision Sci. 46, 1011–1048 (2015).
Google Scholar
Gupta, N., Tiwari, A., Bukkapatnam, S. T. S. & Karri, R. Additive manufacturing cyber-physical system: supply chain cybersecurity and risks. IEEE Access 8, 47322–47333 (2020).
Google Scholar
Segura Velandia, D. M., Kaur, N., Whittow, W. G., Conway, P. P. & West, A. A. Towards industrial internet of things: Crankshaft monitoring, traceability and tracking using RFID. Robot Comput. Integr. Manuf. 41, 66–77 (2016).
Google Scholar
Ha, B.-H. et al. Fast and direct engraving of iridescent lettering on original product surface using laser interference to prevent counterfeiting. Optics Lasers Eng. 107, 214–220 (2018).
Google Scholar
Manyika, J. Manufacturing the future: the next era of global growth and innovation. (McKinsey Global Institute, 2012).
Seifi, M. et al. Progress towards metal additive manufacturing standardization to support qualification and certification. JOM 69, 439–455 (2017).
Google Scholar
McGregor, D. J., Bimrose, M. V., Tawfick, S. & King, W. P. Large batch metrology on internal features of additively manufactured parts using X-ray computed tomography. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 306, 117605 (2022).
Google Scholar
Everton, S. K., Hirsch, M., Stravroulakis, P., Leach, R. K. & Clare, A. T. Review of in-situ process monitoring and in-situ metrology for metal additive manufacturing. Mater. Des. 95, 431–445 (2016).
Google Scholar
Brenken, B., Barocio, E., Favaloro, A., Kunc, V. & Pipes, R. B. Development and validation of extrusion deposition additive manufacturing process simulations. Addit. Manuf. 25, 218–226 (2019).
Frankel, A. Advancing additive #5: part serialization enables a traceable digital thread. Siemens (2020).
Delmotte, A., Tanaka, K., Kubo, H., Funatomi, T. & Mukaigawa, Y. Blind watermarking for 3-D printed objects by locally modifying layer thickness. IEEE Trans. Multimedia 22, 2780–2791 (2020).
Google Scholar
Salas, D. et al. Embedding hidden information in additively manufactured metals via magnetic property grading for traceability. Addit. Manuf.60, 103261 (2022).
Google Scholar
Wigger, B., Koinzer, I., Meissner, T., Barth, M. & Zimmermann, A. Robust and fast part traceability in a production chain exploiting inherent, individual surface patterns. Robot. Comput Integr Manuf. 63, 101925 (2020).
Google Scholar
Tsai, M.-J. & Yuadi, I. Digital forensics of microscopic images for printed source identification. Multimed. Tools Appl. 77, 8729–8758 (2018).
Google Scholar
Wu Y., Kong X., You X. G., & Guo Y. Printer forensics based on page document’s geometric distortion. In: 2009 16th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP) 2909–2912 (IEEE, Cairo, Egypt, 2009). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIP.2009.5413420.
Joshi, S. & Khanna, N. Single classifier-based passive system for source printer classification using local texture features. IEEE Trans. Inform. Forensic Secur. 13, 1603–1614 (2018).
Google Scholar
Jiang, Z. et al. Prediction of laser printers and cartridges based on three-dimensional profiles via discrimination analysis. Forensic Sci. Int. 363, 112186 (2024).
Google Scholar
Joshi, S., Saxena, S. & Khanna, N. Source printer identification from document images acquired using smartphone. J. Inform. Secur. Appl. 84, 103804 (2024).
Nandanwar, L. et al. A conformable moments-based deep learning system for forged handwriting detection. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. 35, 5407–5420 (2024).
Google Scholar
Reddy, V. et al. Study on surface texture of fused deposition modeling. Procedia Manuf. 25, 389–396 (2018).
Google Scholar
Li, Z. et al. PrinTracker: fingerprinting 3D printers using commodity scanners. In: Proceedings of the 2018 acm sigsac conference on computer and communications security 1306–1323 (ACM, Toronto Canada, 2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3243734.3243735.
Aronson, A., Elyashiv, A., Cohen, Y. & Wiesner, S. A novel method for linking between a 3D printer and printed objects using toolmark comparison techniques. J. Forensic Sci. 66, 2405–2412 (2021).
Google Scholar
Shim, B. S., Choe, J. H. & Hou, J.-U. Source Identification of 3D Printer Based on Layered Texture Encoders. IEEE Trans. Multimedia 25, 8240–8252 (2023).
Google Scholar
Shim, B. S., Shin, Y. S., Park, S. W. & Hou, J.-U. SI3DP: Source identification challenges and benchmark for consumer-level 3d printer forensics. In: Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Multimedia 1721–1729 (ACM, Virtual Event China, 2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3474085.3475316.
Blakey-Milner, B. et al. Metal additive manufacturing in aerospace: a review. Mater. Des. 209, 110008 (2021).
Google Scholar
Aimar, A., Palermo, A. & Innocenti, B. The role of 3D printing in medical applications: a state of the art. J. Healthcare Eng. 2019, 1–10 (2019).
Google Scholar
Wester, C. BMW: the road to one million 3D printed parts. Addinor (2018).
Tumbleston, J. R. et al. Continuous liquid interface production of 3D objects. Science 347, 1349–1352 (2015).
Google Scholar
HP multi jet fusion technology: a disruptive 3d printing technology for a new era of manufacturing. (2017).
Guide to Stereolithography (SLA) 3D printing. Formlabs https://formlabs.com/blog/ultimate-guide-to-stereolithography-sla-3d-printing/.
Rachael Wratkowski. et al. A characterization of the repeatability and performance of stratasys fused deposition modeling (fdm) systems. (2024).
Kim, M. K., Lee, I. H. & Kim, H.-C. Effect of fabrication parameters on surface roughness of FDM parts. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 19, 137–142 (2018).
Google Scholar
Sagbas, B., Gümüş, B. E., Kahraman, Y. & Dowling, D. P. Impact of print bed build location on the dimensional accuracy and surface quality of parts printed by multi-jet fusion. J. Manuf. Processes 70, 290–299 (2021).
Google Scholar
Onuh, S. O. & Hon, K. K. B. Optimising build parameters for improved surface finish in stereolithography. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 38, 329–342 (1998).
Google Scholar
Deng, J. et al. ImageNet: a large-scale hierarchical image database. In: 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 248–255 (IEEE, Miami, FL, 2009). https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2009.5206848.
Sabottke, C. F. & Spieler, B. M. The effect of image resolution on deep learning in radiography. Radiol. Artif. Intell. 2, e190015 (2020).
Google Scholar
Tan, M. & Le, Q. V. EfficientNetV2: smaller models and faster training. arxiv at (2021).
Carl Zeiss Industrial Metrology. Smartzoom 5 – Technical Specifications. Carl Zeiss Industrial Metrology. (2024).
Apple Inc. iPhone 15 – Tech Specs. (2023).
Canon Inc. EOS Rebel T7 Specifications. Canon. (2018).
Creaform. HandySCAN 3D | BLACK Series Technical Specifications. (2023).
Keyence Corporation. Image Dimension Measurement System IM-7500. (2021).
Bruker Alicona. Infinite Focus G6. (2022).
Kundu, P., Luo, X., Qin, Y., Cai, Y. & Liu, Z. A machine learning-based framework for automatic identification of process and product fingerprints for smart manufacturing systems. J. Manuf. Processes 73, 128–138 (2022).
Google Scholar
Yang, H. et al. Six-sigma quality management of additive manufacturing. Proc. IEEE 109, 347–376 (2021).
Google Scholar
Rodriguez Delgadillo, R., Medini, K. & Wuest, T. A DMAIC framework to improve quality and sustainability in additive manufacturing—a case study. Sustainability 14, 581 (2022).
Google Scholar
Final report and recommendations to prevent unapproved parts in the aviation supply chain. (2024).
Horvath, B. Not all parts are created equal. The impact of counterfeit parts in the Air Force supply chain. (Air War College, 2017).
Romer, K., Guo, J., Messick, M. & Peaslee, E. The trade fraud detective: planet money (2024).
Kellenberg, D. & Levinson, A. Misreporting trade: tariff evasion, corruption, and auditing standards. Rev. Int. Econ. 27, 106–129 (2019).
Google Scholar
Cohen, R. S. An F-16 pilot died when his ejection seat failed. Was it counterfeit? Air Force Times (2022).
Identifying counterfeit square D circuit breakers. (2008).
AREVA has informed ASN of irregularities concerning components manufactured in its Creusot forge plant. (2016).
Hobbs, C., Naser, Z., Salisbury, D. & Tzinieris, S. Nuclear security implications of counterfeit, fraudulent and suspect items entering the nuclear supply chain. In: (IAEA International Conference on Nuclear Security (ICONS 2024), 2024).
Guin, U. et al. Counterfeit integrated circuits: a rising threat in the global semiconductor supply chain. Proc. IEEE 102, 1207–1228 (2014).
Google Scholar
DiMase, D., Collier, Z. A., Carlson, J., Gray, R. B. & Linkov, I. Traceability and risk analysis strategies for addressing counterfeit electronics in supply chains for complex systems. Risk Anal. 36, 1834–1843 (2016).
Google Scholar
Li, J. ia, Yao, L. ei, Hendriks, E. & Wang, J. Z. Rhythmic brushstrokes distinguish van gogh from his contemporaries: findings via automated brushstroke extraction. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 34, 1159–1176 (2012).
Google Scholar
Li, C.-T. Unsupervised classification of digital images using enhanced sensor pattern noise. In: Proceedings of 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems 3429–3432 (IEEE, Paris, France, 2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCAS.2010.5537850.
Tuama, A., Comby, F. & Chaumont, M. Camera model identification with the use of deep convolutional neural networks. In: 2016 IEEE International Workshop on Information Forensics and Security (WIFS) 1–6 (IEEE, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, 2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/WIFS.2016.7823908.
Bakhtiarnia, A., Zhang, Q. & Iosifidis, A. EfFicient high-resolution deep learning: a survey. ACM Comput. Surv. 56, 1–35 (2024).
Google Scholar
Wang, Y. et al. Remote sensing image super-resolution and object detection: Benchmark and state of the art. Expert Syst. Appl. 197, 116793 (2022).
Google Scholar
Thavamani, C., Li, M., Cebron, N. & Ramanan, D. FOVEA: foveated image magnification for autonomous navigation. arXiv at (2021).
Wei, X.-S. et al. Fine-grained image analysis with deep learning: a survey. arXiv at (2021).
Yu, W., Zhou, P., Yan, S. & Wang, X. InceptionNeXt: when inception meets ConvNeXt. arXiv at (2023).
Woo, S. et al. ConvNeXt V2: co-designing and scaling convnets with masked autoencoders. arXiv at (2023).
Dosovitskiy, A. et al. An image is worth 16×16 words: transformers for image recognition at scale. arXiv at (2021).
Yu, W. et al. MetaFormer is actually what you need for vision. arXiv at (2022).
link
