A machine learning-based prediction-to-map framework for rapid and accurate spatial flood prediction

0
A machine learning-based prediction-to-map framework for rapid and accurate spatial flood prediction
  • Wahl, T., Jain, S., Bender, J., Meyers, S. D. & Luther, M. E. Increasing risk of compound flooding from storm surge and rainfall for major US cities. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 1093–1097 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sangsefidi, Y., Bagheri, K., Davani, H. & Merrifield, M. Data analysis and integrated modeling of compound flooding impacts on coastal drainage infrastructure under a changing climate. J. Hydrol. 616, 128823 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wijetunge, J. J. & Neluwala, N. G. P. B. Compound flood hazard assessment and analysis due to tropical cyclone-induced storm surges, waves and precipitation: a case study for coastal lowlands of Kelani river basin in Sri Lanka. Nat. Hazards 116, 3979–4007 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirabayashi, Y. et al. Global flood risk under climate change. Nat. Clim. change 3, 816–821 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, W. et al. A coupled river basin-urban hydrological model (DRIVE-Urban) for real-time urban flood modeling. Water Resour. Res. 58, e2021WR031709 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendes, J. & Maia, R. Hydrologic modelling calibration for operational flood forecasting. Water Resour. Manag. 30, 5671–5685 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, S., Schaake, J. & Zhang, Z. A distributed hydrologic model and threshold frequency-based method for flash flood forecasting at ungauged locations. J. Hydrol. 337, 402–420 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozalis, S., Morin, E., Yair, Y. & Price, C. Flash flood prediction using an uncalibrated hydrological model and radar rainfall data in a Mediterranean watershed under changing hydrological conditions. J. Hydrol. 394, 245–255 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bajo, M., Zampato, L., Umgiesser, G., Cucco, A. & Canestrelli, P. A finite element operational model for storm surge prediction in Venice. Estuar., Coast. Shelf Sci. 75, 236–249 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • Madsen, H. & Jakobsen, F. Cyclone induced storm surge and flood forecasting in the northern Bay of Bengal. Coast. Eng. 51, 277–296 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattocks, C. & Forbes, C. A real-time, event-triggered storm surge forecasting system for the state of North Carolina. Ocean Model. 25, 95–119 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, K., Li, Y., Liu, H., Rhome, J. & Forbes, C. Transition of the coastal and estuarine storm tide model to an operational storm surge forecast model: A case study of the Florida coast. Weather Forecast. 28, 1019–1037 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bao, D. et al. A numerical investigation of Hurricane Florence-induced compound flooding in the Cape Fear Estuary using a dynamically coupled hydrological-ocean model. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 14, e2022MS003131 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bao, D., Xue, Z. G. & Warner, J. C. Quantifying compound and nonlinear effects of hurricane-induced flooding using a dynamically coupled hydrological-ocean model. Water Resour. Res. 60, e2023WR036455 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosavi, A., Ozturk, P. & Chau, K. W. Flood prediction using machine learning models: Literature review. Water 10, 1536 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dazzi, S., Vacondio, R. & Mignosa, P. Flood stage forecasting using machine-learning methods: A case study on the Parma River (Italy). Water 13, 1612 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, S. & Kumari, S. Comparison of machine learning models for flood forecasting in the Mahanadi River Basin, India. J. Water Clim. Change 15, 1629–1652 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi, J. et al. Deep learning models for flood predictions in south florida. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.15907 (2023).

  • Zhao, Y., Jiang, C., Vega, M. A., Todd, M. D. & Hu, Z. Surrogate modeling of nonlinear dynamic systems: A comparative study. J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng. 23, 011001 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahura, F. T. et al. Training machine learning surrogate models from a high-fidelity physics-based model: Application for real-time street-scale flood prediction in an urban coastal community. Water Resour. Res. 56, e2019WR027038 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahura, F. T. & Goodall, J. L. Predicting combined tidal and pluvial flood inundation using a machine learning surrogate model. J. Hydrol. Regl. Stud. 41, 101087 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hou, J., Zhou, N., Chen, G., Huang, M. & Bai, G. Rapid forecasting of urban flood inundation using multiple machine learning models. Nat. Hazards 108, 2335–2356 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosseiny, H., Nazari, F., Smith, V. & Nataraj, C. A framework for modeling flood depth using a hybrid of hydraulics and machine learning. Sci. Rep. 10, 8222 (2020).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kabir, S. et al. A deep convolutional neural network model for rapid prediction of fluvial flood inundation. J. Hydrol. 590, 125481 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Frame, J. M. et al. Rapid inundation mapping using the US National Water Model, satellite observations, and a convolutional neural network. Geophys. Res. Lett. 51, e2024GL109424 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Löwe, R., Böhm, J., Jensen, D. G., Leandro, J. & Rasmussen, S. H. U.-F. L. O. O. D. Topographic deep learning for predicting urban pluvial flood water depth. J. Hydrol. 603, 126898 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, R., Fang, F., Pain, C. C. & Navon, I. M. Rapid spatio-temporal flood prediction and uncertainty quantification using a deep learning method. J. Hydrol. 575, 911–920 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kao, I. F., Liou, J. Y., Lee, M. H. & Chang, F. J. Fusing stacked autoencoder and long short-term memory for regional multistep-ahead flood inundation forecasts. J. Hydrol. 598, 126371 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraehr, N., Wang, Q. J., Wu, W. & Nathan, R. Development of a fast and accurate hybrid model for floodplain inundation simulations. Water Resour. Res. 59, e2022WR033836 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, X. & Willems, P. A hybrid model for fast and probabilistic urban pluvial flood prediction. Water Resour. Res. 56, e2019WR025128 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz, D. F., Moftakhari, H. & Moradkhani, H. Quantifying cascading uncertainty in compound flood modeling with linked process-based and machine learning models. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 28, 2531–2553 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Keim, B. D., Muller, R. A. & Stone, G. W. Spatiotemporal patterns and return periods of tropical storm and hurricane strikes from Texas to Maine. J. Clim. 20, 3498–3509 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • Trepanier, J. C., Nielsen-Gammon, J., Brown, V. M., Thompson, D. T. & Keim, B. D. Stalling North Atlantic Tropical Cyclones. J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol. 63, 1409–1426 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, E. S., & Zelinsky, D. A. National Hurricane Center tropical cyclone report: Hurricane Harvey (AL092017). National Hurricane Center (2018).

  • Alizadeh, R., Allen, J. K. & Mistree, F. Managing computational complexity using surrogate models: a critical review. Res. Eng. Des. 31, 275–298 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Razavi, S., Tolson, B. A. & Burn, D. H. Review of surrogate modeling in water resources. Water Resour. Res. 48, W07401 (2012).

  • Zhou, Y., Wu, W., Nathan, R. & Wang, Q. J. A rapid flood inundation modelling framework using deep learning with spatial reduction and reconstruction. Environ. Model. Softw. 143, 105112 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, Y., Wu, W., Nathan, R. & Wang, Q. J. Deep learning-based rapid flood inundation modeling for flat floodplains with complex flow paths. Water Resour. Res. 58, e2022WR033214 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Contreras, M. T., Gironás, J. & Escauriaza, C. Forecasting flood hazards in real-time: A surrogate model for hydrometeorological events in an Andean watershed. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss. 2020, 1–24 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Droppers, B., Bierkens, M. F. P. & Wanders, N. A multi-resolution deep-learning surrogate framework for global hydrological models. Water Resour. Res. 61, e2024WR037736 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, R., Pan, B. & Duan, Q. A surrogate modeling method for distributed land surface hydrological models based on deep learning. J. Hydrol. 624, 129944 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, P. et al. Digital Twin Earth–Coasts: Developing a fast and physics-informed surrogate model for coastal floods via neural operators., (2021). arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.07100 .

  • Xu, Z. et al. arXiv preprint. A Fast AI Surrogate for Coastal Ocean Circulation Models., (2024). arXiv:2410.14952.

  • Santiago-Collazo, F. L., Bilskie, M. V. & Hagen, S. C. A comprehensive review of compound inundation models in low-gradient coastal watersheds. Environ. Model. Softw. 119, 166–181 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Du, J. & Park, K. Estuarine salinity recovery from an extreme precipitation event: Hurricane Harvey in Galveston Bay. Sci. total Environ. 670, 1049–1059 (2019).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, W. et al. Compounding factors for extreme flooding around Galveston Bay during Hurricane Harvey. Ocean Model. 158, 101735 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Valle-Levinson, A., Olabarrieta, M. & Heilman, L. Compound flooding in Houston-Galveston bay during hurricane harvey. Sci. Total Environ. 747, 141272 (2020).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, L. C., Liou, J. Y. & Chang, F. J. Spatial-temporal flood inundation nowcasts by fusing machine learning methods and principal component analysis. J. Hydrol. 612, 128086 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. et al. A short-term flood prediction based on spatial deep learning network: A case study for Xi County, China. J. Hydrol. 607, 127535 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jing, R., Lin, N., Emanuel, K., Vecchi, G. & Knutson, T. R. A comparison of tropical cyclone projections in a high-resolution global climate model and from downscaling by statistical and statistical-deterministic methods. J. Clim. 34, 9349–9364 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • NOAA National Water Model CONUS Retrospective Dataset. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://registry.opendata.aws/nwm-archive.

  • NOAA North American Mesoscale Forecast System (NAM). (n.d.). Retrieved from https://registry.opendata.aws/noaa-nam.

  • Rasp, S., Pritchard, M. S. & Gentine, P. Deep learning to represent subgrid processes in climate models. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 115, 9684–9689 (2018).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichstein, M. et al. Deep learning and process understanding for data-driven Earth system science. Nature 566, 195–204 (2019).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Gochis, D. J. et al. WRF-Hydro V5 Technical Description Originally Created: Updated: WRF-Hydro V5 Technical Description. NCAR Technical Note, 1–107 (2018).

  • Shchepetkin, A. F. & McWilliams, J. C. The regional oceanic modeling system (ROMS): a split-explicit, free-surface, topography-following-coordinate oceanic model. Ocean Model. 9, 347–404 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner, J. C., Armstrong, B., He, R. & Zambon, J. B. Development of a Coupled Ocean–Atmosphere–Wave–Sediment Transport (COAWST) Modeling System. Ocean Model. 35, 230–244 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunkel, K. E. & Champion, S. M. An assessment of rainfall from Hurricanes Harvey and Florence relative to other extremely wet storms in the United States. Geophys. Res. Lett. 46, 13500–13506 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, J. Estimation of relationships for limited dependent variables. Econometrica: J. Econ. Soc. 24-36 (1958).

  • link

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *