Estimation of hydrogen solubility in aqueous solutions using machine learning techniques for hydrogen storage in deep saline aquifers
Qureshi, R. A. et al. Facile eggplant assisted mixed metal oxide nanostructures: a promising electrocatalyst for water oxidation in alkaline media. Mater. Today Sustain. 23, 100446 (2023).
da Silva Batista, V. et al. Sustainable solutions for clean energy production (Seven Editora, 2023).
Google Scholar
Szeberényi, A., Rokicki, T. & Papp-Váry, Á. Examining the relationship between renewable energy and environmental awareness. Energies. 15 (19), 7082 (2022).
Google Scholar
Ribeiro, G. F. & Junior, A. B. The global energy matrix and use of agricultural residues for bioenergy production: a review with inspiring insights that aim to contribute to deliver solutions for society and industrial sectors through suggestions for future research. Waste Manag. Res. 41 (8), 1283–1304 (2023).
Google Scholar
Moemen, Y. S., Alshater, H. & El-Sayed, I.E.-T. Clean energy management based on internet of things and sensor networks for climate change problems. In The power of data: driving climate change with data science and artificial intelligence innovations. 117–136 (Springer, Cham, 2023).
Hanan, A. et al. CoSe2@ Co3O4 nanostructures: a promising catalyst for oxygen evolution reaction in alkaline media. Catal Commun. 186, 106830 (2024).
Google Scholar
Yang, Z. X. et al. 2022 roadmap on hydrogen energy from production to utilizations. Rare Met. 41 (10), 3251–3267 (2022).
Google Scholar
Alex, C. and N.S. John. Hydrogen and hydrocarbons as fuel.Green Energy Harvest.: Mater Hydrogen Gen. Carbon Dioxide Reduc. 1, 23–45 (2022).
Pandit, V. R. U. Hydrogen as a clean energy source, in alternative energies and efficiency evaluation (IntechOpen, London, 2021).
Kumar, K., Sharma, M. & Shukla, A. K. Hydrogen as a fuel for power generation—a review. In Biennial international conference on future learning aspects of mechanical engineering (Springer, Singapore, 2022).
Noyan, O. F., Hasan, M. M. & Pala, N. A global review of the hydrogen energy eco-system. Energies. 16 (3), 1484 (2023).
Google Scholar
Sun, Z. Hydrogen energy: development prospects, current obstacles and policy suggestions under China’s dual Carbon goals. Chin. J. Urban Environ. Stud. 11 (01), 2350006 (2023).
Google Scholar
Zhao, M. The current status of hydrogen energy industry and application of hydrogen fuel cell vehicles. Highlights Sci. Eng. Technol. 59, 97–102 (2023).
Google Scholar
Albatayneh, A. M., Jaradat, & Moldovan, L. Hydrogen production and use: an overview of its importance in mitigating climate change and its nexus with renewable and power engineering. In 2023 17th International Conference on Engineering of Modern Electric Systems (EMES) (IEEE, Red Hook, 2023).
Arsad, A. Z. et al. Hydrogen energy storage integrated hybrid renewable energy systems: a review analysis for future research directions. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy. 47 (39), 17285–17312 (2022).
Google Scholar
Jaiswal, A. & Sahu, S. Hydrogen storage challenge in the hydrogen-based civilization, in hydrogen fuel cell technology for mobile applications. 157–181 (IGI Global, Hershey, 2023).
Google Scholar
Ghorbani, B. et al. Hydrogen storage in North America: status, prospects, and challenges. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 11 (3), 109957 (2023).
Google Scholar
Shardeo, V. & Sarkar, B. D. Adoption of hydrogen-fueled freight transportation: a strategy toward sustainability. Bus. Strategy Environ. 33 (2), 223–240 (2024).
Google Scholar
Dehghani, M. R., Ghazi, S. F. & Kazemzadeh, Y. Interfacial tension and wettability alteration during hydrogen and carbon dioxide storage in depleted gas reservoirs. Sci. Rep. 14 (1), 11594 (2024).
Google Scholar
Urunkar, R. U. & Patil, S. D. Hydrogen storage technologies and related heat and mass transfer studies. In Hydrogen fuel cell technology for mobile applications. 182–206 (IGI Global, 2023).
Whittam, D. et al. The surface challenges of underground hydrogen storage–pre-feasibility studies at the Otway International Test Centre, Victoria. APPEA J. 63 (2), S473–S477 (2023).
Google Scholar
Ahmed, M. R., Barua, T. & Das, B. K. A comprehensive review on techno-environmental analysis of state-of-the-art production and storage of hydrogen energy: challenges and way forward. Energy Sour. Part A Recover. Utilization Environ. Eff. 45 (2), 5905–5937 (2023).
Epelle, E. I. et al. Perspectives and prospects of underground hydrogen storage and natural hydrogen. Sustainable Energy Fuels. 6 (14), 3324–3343 (2022).
Google Scholar
El-Amin, M. F. Modeling, analysis, and simulation of hydrogen leakage jet in the air. Industr. Transform. 1, 129–142 (2022).
Heinemann, N. et al. Enabling large-scale hydrogen storage in porous media–the scientific challenges. Energy Environ. Sci. 14 (2), 853–864 (2021).
Google Scholar
Ugarte, E. R. & Salehi, S. A review on well integrity issues for underground hydrogen storage. J. Energy Res. Technol. 144 (4), 042001 (2022).
Google Scholar
Barison, E. et al. An insight into underground hydrogen storage in Italy. Sustainability. 15 (8), 6886 (2023).
Google Scholar
Yan, H. et al. The necessity and feasibility of hydrogen storage for large-scale, long-term energy storage in the new power system in China. Energies. 16 (13), 4837 (2023).
Google Scholar
Yu, Y. Hydrogen energy storage and its applications. Highlights Sci. Eng. Technol. 58, 395–403 (2023).
Google Scholar
Lackey, G. et al. Characterizing hydrogen storage potential in US underground gas storage facilities. Geophys. Res. Lett. 50 (3), e2022GL101420 (2023).
Google Scholar
Alms, K. et al. Linking geological and infrastructural requirements for large-scale underground hydrogen storage in Germany. Front. Energy Res. 11, 1172003 (2023).
Google Scholar
Martínez-Cámara, E. et al. Hydrogen sustainability for short term storage of wind farm electricity. In International conference on The Digital Transformation in the Graphic Engineering (Springer, Cham, 2022).
Mahdy, A. E. Green hydrogen and its role in renewable energy and sustainable development. Int. J. Adv. Eng. Civil Res. 2 (2), 1–18 (2022).
Google Scholar
Perera, M. A review of underground hydrogen storage in depleted gas reservoirs: insights into various rock-fluid interaction mechanisms and their impact on the process integrity. Fuel. 334, 126677 (2023).
Google Scholar
Arekhov, V. et al. Measurement of effective hydrogen-methane gas diffusion coefficients in Reservoir Rocks. SPE Reservoir Eval. Eng. 26 (04), 1242–1257 (2023).
Google Scholar
Andiappan, A., Pichler, M. & Bauer, S. Investigation of Subsurface integrity of depleted porous gas reservoirs for the purpose of hydrogen storage. In SPE EuropEC-Europe Energy Conference featured at the 84th EAGE Annual Conference & Exhibition (OnePetro, Vienna, 2023).
Zelenika, I. et al. Hydrogen underground storage as a critical factor in the energy transition period. Tehnički Vjesn. 28 (5), 1480–1487 (2021).
Stemmle, R. et al. Environmental impacts of aquifer thermal energy storage (ATES). Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 151, 111560 (2021).
Google Scholar
Park, E. S., Jung, Y. B. & Oh, S. Carbon neutrality and underground hydrogen storage. J. Korean Soc. Mineral. Energy Resour. Eng. 59 (5), 462–473 (2022).
Google Scholar
Guan, W. et al. Safe design of a hydrogen-powered ship: CFD simulation on hydrogen leakage in the fuel cell room. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 11 (3), 651 (2023).
Google Scholar
Kalam, S. et al. A mini-review on underground hydrogen storage: production to field studies. Energy Fuels. 37 (12), 8128–8141 (2023).
Google Scholar
Khawaja, M. K., Alkhalidi, A. & Mansour, S. Environmental impacts of energy storage waste and regional legislation to curtail their effects–highlighting the status in Jordan. J. Energy Storage. 26, 100919 (2019).
Google Scholar
Jansons, L. et al. The potential of the hydrogen underground storages: their types, development chalannges and the latvian situation. In IEEE 63th International Scientific Conference on Power and Electrical Engineering of Riga Technical University (RTUCON). 2022. (IEEE, Danvers, 2022).
Saeed, M. et al. Nanoscale silicon porous materials for efficient hydrogen storage application. J. Energy Storage. 81, 110418 (2024).
Google Scholar
Aftab, U. et al. An advanced PdNPs@ MoS 2 nanocomposite for efficient oxygen evolution reaction in alkaline media. RSC Adv. 13 (46), 32413–32423 (2023).
Google Scholar
Solangi, M. Y. et al. In-situ growth of nonstoichiometric CrO0. 87 and Co3O4 hybrid system for the enhanced electrocatalytic water splitting in alkaline media. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy. 48 (93), 36439–36451 (2023).
Google Scholar
Sheppard, D. A. et al. Methods for accurate high-temperature sieverts-type hydrogen measurements of metal hydrides. J. Alloys Compd. 787, 1225–1237 (2019).
Google Scholar
Detector, T. C. Hydrogen detection with a TCD using mixed carrier gas on the agilent micro GC. Signal. 1 (R2) R3 (2013).
Gerothanassis, I. P. et al. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy: basic principles and phenomena, and their applications to chemistry, biology and medicine. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 3 (2), 229–252 (2002).
Google Scholar
Bovey, F. A., Mirau, P. A. & Gutowsky, H. Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, 1 (Elsevier, 1988).
Boiani, M. & Pacheco, C. Nuclear magnetic resonance (2022).
Rashid, M., Singh, S. K. & Singh, C. Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy: theory and applications. Modern Tech Spectrosc: Basics Instrument. Appl. 1, 469–512. (2021).
Fangnon, E. et al. Improved accuracy of thermal desorption spectroscopy by specimen cooling during measurement of hydrogen concentration in a high-strength steel. Materials. 13 (5), 1252 (2020).
Google Scholar
Laureys, A. et al. Thermal desorption spectroscopy evaluation of hydrogen-induced damage and deformation-induced defects. Mater. Sci. Technol. 36 (13), 1389–1397 (2020).
Google Scholar
Huang, S. J., Mose, M. P. & Kannaiyan, S. Artificial intelligence application in solid state Mg-based hydrogen energy storage. J. Compos. Sci. 5 (6), 145 (2021).
Google Scholar
Baran, A. & Polański, M. Magnesium-based materials for hydrogen storage—a scope review. Materials. 13 (18), 3993 (2020).
Google Scholar
Zhang, J. et al. Accurate and efficient machine learning models for predicting hydrogen evolution reaction catalysts based on structural and electronic feature engineering in alloys. Nanoscale. 15 (26), 11072–11082 (2023).
Google Scholar
Bhattacharjee, S. et al. A semi-supervised machine learning framework for predicting hydrogen storage capacities in metal hydrides. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.17587, (2024).
Mohammadi, M. R. et al. Modeling hydrogen solubility in hydrocarbons using extreme gradient boosting and equations of state. Sci. Rep. 11 (1), 17911 (2021).
Google Scholar
Jiang, Y. et al. Hydrogen solubility in aromatic/cyclic compounds: prediction by different machine learning techniques. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy. 46, 23591–23602 (2021).
Google Scholar
Dreher, A. et al. AI agents envisioning the future: forecast-based operation of renewable energy storage systems using hydrogen with deep reinforcement learning. Energy. Conv. Manag. 258, 115401 (2022).
Google Scholar
Zhu, Z. et al. An accurate model for estimating H2 solubility in pure water and aqueous NaCl solutions. Energies. 15 (14), 5021 (2022).
Google Scholar
Ansari, S. et al. Prediction of hydrogen solubility in aqueous solutions: comparison of equations of state and advanced machine learning-metaheuristic approaches. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy. 47 (89), 37724–37741 (2022).
Google Scholar
Cao, Y. et al. Using artificial neural network to optimize hydrogen solubility and evaluation of environmental condition effects. Int. J. Low-Carbon Technol. 17, 80–89 (2022).
Google Scholar
Lv, Q. et al. Modeling hydrogen solubility in water: comparison of adaptive boosting support vector regression, gene expression programming, and cubic equations of state. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy. 57, 637–650 (2024).
Google Scholar
Mohammadi, M. R. et al. Modeling hydrogen solubility in alcohols using machine learning models and equations of state. J. Mol. Liq. 346, 117807 (2022).
Google Scholar
Zhou, Z. et al. Relying on machine learning methods for predicting hydrogen solubility in different alcoholic solvents. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy. 47 (9), 5817–5827 (2022).
Google Scholar
Hadavimoghaddam, F. et al. Modeling hydrogen solubility in alcohols using group method of data handling and genetic programming. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy. 48 (7), 2689–2704 (2023).
Google Scholar
Cao, Y. et al. Machine learning methods help accurate estimation of the hydrogen solubility in biomaterials. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy. 47 (6), 3611–3624 (2022).
Google Scholar
Mohammadi, M. R. et al. Application of robust machine learning methods to modeling hydrogen solubility in hydrocarbon fuels. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy. 47 (1), 320–338 (2022).
Google Scholar
Amar, M. N. et al. Predicting the solubility of hydrogen in hydrocarbon fractions: advanced data-driven machine learning approach and equation of state. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 153, 105215 (2023).
Google Scholar
Hasan, Z., Xing, H. J. & Magray, M. I. Big data machine learning using apache spark mllib. Mesopotamian J. Big Data. 2022, 1–11 (2022).
Google Scholar
Mansir, I. B., Musharavati, F. & Abubakar, A. A. Using deep learning artificial intelligence and multiobjective optimization in obtaining the optimum ratio of a fuel cell to electrolyzer power in a hydrogen storage system. Int. J. Energy Res. 46 (15), 21281–21292 (2022).
Google Scholar
Wang, J. et al. Optimal design of combined operations of wind power-pumped storage-hydrogen energy storage based on deep learning. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 218, 109216 (2023).
Google Scholar
Bhimineni, S. H. et al. Machine-learning-assisted investigation of the diffusion of hydrogen in brine by performing molecular dynamics simulation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.02966,(2022).
Shi, X. et al. Exploring technological solutions for onboard hydrogen storage systems through a heterogeneous knowledge network: from current state to future research opportunities. Front. Energy Res. 10, 899245 (2022).
Google Scholar
Shekhar, S. & Chowdhury, C. Topological data analysis enhanced prediction of hydrogen storage in metal–organic frameworks (MOFs). Mater. Adv. 5 (2), 820–830 (2024).
Google Scholar
Nachtane, M. et al. An overview of the recent advances in composite materials and artificial intelligence for hydrogen storage vessels design. J. Compos. Sci. 7 (3), 119 (2023).
Google Scholar
Gómez, J. A. & Santos, D. M. The status of on-board hydrogen storage in fuel cell electric vehicles. Designs. 7 (4), 97 (2023).
Google Scholar
Shchegolkov, A. V. et al. Recent advantages on waste management in hydrogen industry. Polymers. 14 (22), 4992 (2022).
Google Scholar
Crozier, T. E. & Yamamoto, S. Solubility of hydrogen in water, sea water, and sodium chloride solutions. J. Chem. Eng. Data. 19 (3), 242–244 (1974).
Google Scholar
Morrison, T. & Billett, F. 730. The salting-out of non-electrolytes. Part II. The effect of variation in non-electrolyte. J. Chem. Soc. 1952, 3819–3822 (1952).
Jáuregui-Haza, U. et al. Solubility of hidrogen and carbon monoxide in water and some organic solvents. Latin Am. Appl. Res. 34 (2), 71–74 (2004).
Kling, G. & Maurer, G. The solubility of hydrogen in water and in 2-aminoethanol at temperatures between 323 K and 423 K and pressures up to 16 MPa. J. Chem. Thermodyn. 23 (6), 531–541 (1991).
Google Scholar
Gordon, L. I., Cohen, Y. & Standley, D. R. The solubility of molecular hydrogen in seawater. Deep Sea Res. 24 (10), 937–941 (1977).
Google Scholar
Wiebe, R. & Gaddy, V. The solubility of hydrogen in water at 0, 50, 75 and 100 from 25 to 1000 atmospheres. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 56 (1), 76–79 (1934).
Google Scholar
Ruetschi, P. & Amlie, R. Solubility of hydrogen in potassium hydroxide and sulfuric acid. Salting-out and hydration. J. Phys. Chem. 70 (3), 718–723 (1966).
Google Scholar
Morais, É. T. et al. Pearson correlation coefficient applied to petroleum system characterization: the case study of Potiguar and Reconcavo Basins, Brazil. Geosciences. 13 (9), 282 (2023).
Google Scholar
Dehghani, M. R. et al. Data driven models for predicting pH of CO2 in aqueous solutions: Implications for CO2 sequestration. Results Eng. 24, 102889 (2024).
Saleem, S., Aslam, M. & Shaukat, M. R. A review and empirical comparison of univariate outlier detection methods. Pakistan J. Stat. 37 (4), 447–462 (2021).
Liu, Z. et al. A powerful prediction framework of fracture parameters for hydraulic fracturing incorporating eXtreme gradient boosting and bayesian optimization. Energies. 16 (23), 7890 (2023).
Google Scholar
Kong, D., Wang, S. & Ping, P. State-of‐health estimation and remaining useful life for lithium‐ion battery based on deep learning with bayesian hyperparameter optimization. Int. J. Energy Res. 46 (5), 6081–6098 (2022).
Google Scholar
Wang, X. et al. Recent advances in bayesian optimization. ACM Comput. Surveys. 55 (13s), 1–36 (2023).
Google Scholar
Turic, M. et al. Advanced bayesian network for task effort estimation in Agile software development. Appl. Sci. 13 (16), 9465 (2023).
Google Scholar
Banchhor, C. & Srinivasu, N. Analysis of bayesian optimization algorithms for big data classification based on Map reduce framework. J. Big Data. 8 (1), 81 (2021).
Google Scholar
Rodriguez, D., Dolado, J. & Tuya, J. Bayesian concepts in software testing: an initial review. In Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Automating Test Case Design, Selection and Evaluation (2015).
Li, Y., Zhang, Y. & Cai, Y. A new hyper-parameter optimization method for power load forecast based on recurrent neural networks. Algorithms. 14 (6), 163 (2021).
Galton, F. Regression towards mediocrity in hereditary stature. J. Anthropol. Inst. Great Br. Irel. 15, 246–263 (1886).
James, G. et al. Linear regression. In An introduction to statistical learning: with applications in python. (eds Allen G, De Veaux, R. & Nugent, R.). 6–134 (Springer, Cham, 2023).
Kibria, B. & Lukman, A. F. A new ridge-type estimator for the linear regression model: simulations and applications. Scientifica. 2020, 9758378 (2020).
Etemadi, S. & Khashei, M. Etemadi multiple linear regression. Measurement. 186, 110080 (2021).
Google Scholar
Abu-Faraj, M.a., A. Al-Hyari, and Z. Alqadi. Experimental analysis of methods used to solve linear regression models.Comp. Mater. Continua. 72 (3), 5699–5712 (2022).
Bahaloo, S., Mehrizadeh, M. & Najafi-Marghmaleki, A. Review of application of artificial intelligence techniques in petroleum operations. Petroleum Res. 8 (2), 167–182 (2023).
Google Scholar
McCulloch, W. S. & Pitts, W. A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. Bull. Math. Biophys. 5, 115–133 (1943).
Google Scholar
Babatunde, D. E., Anozie, A. & Omoleye, J. Artificial neural network and its applications in the energy sector: an overview. Int. J. Energy Econ. Policy. 10 (2), 250–264 (2020).
Google Scholar
Dastres, R. & Soori, M. Artificial neural network systems. Int. J. Imaging Rob. (IJIR). 21 (2), 13–25 (2021).
Paul, A., Prasad, A. & Kumar, A. Review on artificial neural network and its application in the field of engineering. J. Mech. Eng. Prakash. 1, 53–61 (2022).
Google Scholar
Okwu, M. O. et al. Artificial neural network. Metaheuristic optimization: nature-inspired algorithms swarm and computational intelligence, theory and applications. 133–145 (2021).
Breiman, L. et al. Classification and regression trees–crc press (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1984).
McGibney, D. P. Applied linear regression for business analytics with R: a practical guide to data science with case studies. Vol. 337 Vol. 337 (Springer Nature, Cham, 2023).
Loh, W. Y. Logistic regression tree analysis. In Springer Handbook of Engineering Statistics 593–604 (Springer, London, 2023).
Maleki, M. et al. Investigation of wettability and IFT alteration during hydrogen storage using machine learning. Heliyon. 10 (19), e38679 (2024).
Gomes, C. M. A. & Jelihovschi, E. Presenting the regression tree method and its application in a large-scale educational dataset. Int. J. Res. Method Educ. 43 (2), 201–221 (2020).
Google Scholar
Drucker, H. et al. Support vector regression machines. Adv. Neural. Inf. Process. Syst. 9, 155–161 (1996).
Huang, H., Wei, X. & Zhou, Y. An overview on twin support vector regression. Neurocomputing. 490, 80–92 (2022).
Google Scholar
Gholami, R. & Moradzadeh, A. Support vector regression for prediction of gas reservoirs permeability. J. Min. Environ. 2 (1), 41–52 (2012).
Liu, M. et al. Gaussian processes for learning and control: a tutorial with examples. IEEE Control Syst. Mag. 38 (5), 53–86 (2018).
Google Scholar
Park, C. et al. Robust gaussian process regression with a bias model. Pattern Recogn. 124, 108444 (2022).
Google Scholar
Young, T. A. et al. A transferable active-learning strategy for reactive molecular force fields. Chem. Sci. 12 (32), 10944–10955 (2021).
Google Scholar
Breiman, L. Bagging predictors. Mach. Learn. 24, 123–140 (1996).
Google Scholar
James, G. et al. Tree-based methods. In An introduction to statistical learning: with applications in python. (eds Allen G, De Veaux, R. & Nugent, R.). 331–366 (Springer, Cham, 2023).
Malek, N. H. A. et al. Comparison of ensemble hybrid sampling with bagging and boosting machine learning approach for imbalanced data. Indones J. Elec Eng. Comput. Sci. 29, 598–608 (2023).
Friedman, J. H. Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine. Ann. Stat. 29, 1189–1232 (2001).
McElfresh, D. et al. When Do Neural Nets Outperform Boosted Trees on Tabular Data? arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.02997, (2023).
Liu, X. & Pan, R. Boost-R: gradient boosted trees for recurrence data. J. Qual. Technol. 53 (5), 545–565 (2021).
Google Scholar
Geurts, P., Ernst, D. & Wehenkel, L. Extremely randomized trees. Mach. Learn. 63, 3–42 (2006).
Google Scholar
Cahyana, N. H., Fauziah, Y. & Aribowo, A. S. The comparison of tree-based ensemble machine learning for classifying public datasets. In RSF Conference Series: Engineering and Technology (2021).
Chu, Z., Yu, J. & Hamdulla, A. Throughput prediction based on extratree for stream processing tasks. Comput. Sci. Inform. Syst. 18 (1), 1–22 (2021).
Google Scholar
Prokhorenkova, L. et al. CatBoost: unbiased boosting with categorical features. Adv. Neural. Inf. Process. Syst. 31 (2018). Conference paper
Hancock, J. T. & Khoshgoftaar, T. M. CatBoost for big data: an interdisciplinary review. J. Big Data. 7 (1), 94 (2020).
Google Scholar
Chen, T. & Guestrin, C. Xgboost: a scalable tree boosting system. In Proceedings of the 22nd acm sigkdd international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining (2016).
Dehghani, M., Jahani, S. & Ranjbar, A. Comparing the performance of machine learning methods in estimating the shear wave transit time in one of the reservoirs in southwest of Iran. Sci. Rep. 14 (1), 4744 (2024).
Subasi, A. et al. Permeability prediction of petroleum reservoirs using stochastic gradient boosting regression. J. Ambient Intell. Humaniz. Comput. 13, 1–10. (2020).
Mohammadinia, F. et al. Shale volume estimation using ANN, SVR, and RF algorithms compared with conventional methods. J. Afr. Earth Sc. 205, 104991 (2023).
Google Scholar
Mohammadinia, F. et al. Application of machine learning algorithms in classification the flow units of the Kazhdumi reservoir in one of the oil fields in southwest of Iran. J. Petroleum Explor. Prod. Technol. 13 (6), 1419–1434 (2023).
Google Scholar
Duan, Y. & Song, C. Relevant modes selection method based on Spearman correlation coefficient for laser signal denoising using empirical mode decomposition. Opt. Rev. 23, 936–949 (2016).
Google Scholar
Zhang, S., Ye, K. & Wang, M. A simple consistent Bayes factor for testing the Kendall rank correlation coefficient. J. Stat. Comput. Simul. 93 (6), 888–903 (2023).
Google Scholar
link
