A clinically validated 3D deep learning approach for quantifying vascular invasion in pancreatic cancer

0
A clinically validated 3D deep learning approach for quantifying vascular invasion in pancreatic cancer
  • Siegel, R. L., Kratzer, T. B., Giaquinto, A. N., Sung, H. & Jemal, A. Cancer statistics, 2025. CA Cancer J. Clin. 75, 10–45 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahib, L., Wehner, M. R., Matrisian, L. M. & Nead, K. T. Estimated projection of US cancer incidence and death to 2040. JAMA Netw. Open. 4, e214708 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Oettle, H. et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and long-term outcomes among patients with resected pancreatic cancer: the CONKO-001 randomized trial. JAMA 310, 1473–1481 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  • Neoptolemos, J. P. et al. Comparison of adjuvant gemcitabine and capecitabine with gemcitabine monotherapy in patients with resected pancreatic cancer (ESPAC-4): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet 389, 1011–1024 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • Conroy, T. et al. FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine as adjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 379, 2395–2406 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rigiroli, F. et al. CT radiomic features of superior mesenteric artery involvement in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a pilot study. Radiology 301, 610–622 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Giovinazzo, F., Turri, G., Katz, M. H., Heaton, N. & Ahmed, I. Meta-analysis of benefits of portal–superior mesenteric vein resection in pancreatic resection for ductal adenocarcinoma. Br. J. Surg. 103, 179–191 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X. et al. Venous resection during pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer: a systematic review. Transl. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 4, 46 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Delpero, J. R. & Sauvanet, A. Vascular resection for pancreatic cancer: 2019 French recommendations based on a literature review from 2008 to 6–2019. Front. Oncol. 10, 40 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Hawary, M. M. et al. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma radiology reporting template: consensus statement of the Society of Abdominal Radiology and the American Pancreatic Association. Radiology 270, 248–260 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zamboni, G. A. et al. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: value of multidetector CT angiography in preoperative evaluation. Radiology 245, 770–778 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma (Version 2.2024) (National Comprehensive Cancer Network, 2024).

  • Miao, Y., Cai, B. & Lu, Z. Technical options in surgery for artery-involving pancreatic cancer: invasion depth matters. Surg. Open Sci. 12, 55–61 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bockhorn, M. et al. Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: a consensus statement by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery. 155, 977–988 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brook, O. R. et al. Structured reporting of multiphasic CT for pancreatic cancer: potential effect on staging and surgical planning. Radiology. 274, 464–472 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • Alemi, F., Rocha, F. G., Helton, W. S., Biehl, T. & Alseidi, A. Classification and techniques of en bloc venous reconstruction for pancreaticoduodenectomy. HPB 18, 827–834 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong, S. B. et al. Pancreatic cancer CT: prediction of resectability according to NCCN criteria. Radiology 289, 710–719 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrone, C. R. et al. Radiological and surgical implications of neoadjuvant treatment with FOLFIRINOX for locally advanced and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. Ann. Surg. 261, 12–17 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • Michelakos, T. et al. Predictors of resectability and survival in patients with borderline and locally advanced pancreatic cancer who underwent neoadjuvant treatment with FOLFIRINOX. Ann. Surg. 269, 733–740 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Asbun, H. J. et al. The miami international evidence-based guidelines on minimally invasive pancreas resection. Ann. Surg. 271, 1–14 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao, K. et al. Large-scale pancreatic cancer detection via non-contrast CT and deep learning. Nat. Med. 29, 3033–3043 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Placido, D. et al. A deep learning algorithm to predict risk of pancreatic cancer from disease trajectories. Nat. Med. 29, 1113–1122 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fu, N. et al. A deep-learning radiomics-based lymph node metastasis predictive model for pancreatic cancer: a diagnostic study. Int. J. Surg. 109, 2196–2203 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Antony, A. et al. AI-driven insights in pancreatic cancer imaging: from pre-diagnostic detection to prognostication. Abdom. Radiol. 50, 3214–3224 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, K. et al. Biomarkers, omics and artificial intelligence for early detection of pancreatic cancer. Semin. Cancer Biol. 111, 76–88 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bereska, J. I. et al. Artificial intelligence for assessment of vascular involvement and tumor resectability on CT in patients with pancreatic cancer. Eur. Radiol. Exp. 8, 18 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vivier, C. et al. Segmentation-based assessment of tumor–vessel involvement for surgical resectability prediction of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. In Proc. IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops (ICCVW) 2413–2423 (IEEE, 2023).

  • Bian, Y. et al. Performance of CT-based radiomics in diagnosis of superior mesenteric vein resection margin in patients with pancreatic head cancer. Abdom. Radiol. 45, 759–773 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, F. et al. Radiomics-assisted presurgical prediction for surgical portal vein–superior mesenteric vein invasion in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Front. Oncol. 10, 523543 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. F. et al. STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration. BMJ Open. 6, e012799 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, G. S., Reitsma, J. B., Altman, D. G. & Moons, K. G. Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement. BMJ 350, g7594 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • Isensee, F. et al. nnU-Net: a self-configuring method for deep learning-based biomedical image segmentation. Nat. Methods. 18, 203–211 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • link

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *